User talk:Aristeas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aristeas.

This is the user talk page of Aristeas, where you can send messages and comments to Aristeas.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Tech News: 2024-46

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops!

[edit]

Sorry about that. It was just an edit conflict. I happened across it at the same time you did, and I didn't see your edit. --Cart (talk) 09:05, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Cart! We just had the same idea at the same time. ;–)
Almost the same idea, of course. There are two strategies how to deal with such cases when a gallery link should include a section anchor, but the section in question (here: #Friuli-Venezia Giulia) does not exist (yet). Either we can still use the complete gallery link and optionally add a hint “(section doesn’t exist yet)” (this is what you did). Or we can just use the bare link to the gallery page, without a section anchor (this is what I did). In both cases we must create the subsection once the image has been promoted to FP status and move the image from the “Unsorted” section to the new one, so the difference is not huge.
I follow my (simpler) strategy because in the past I had the impression that FPCBot sometimes does strange things (like putting an image into the wrong subsection) when we use a section anchor for a section which does not exist (yet); and this is something I want to avoid in any case. But maybe my impression was wrong, so we can also follow your more elaborate strategy. Are there any more reasons for one strategy or the other one?
All the best, – Aristeas (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I didn't know (hadn't noticed) about the funny buisiness the bot was up to with these pre-sections. The reasons I add them are that voters are often more positive to photos of something new (instead of yet another photo of the Golden Gate bridge) and explain to voters why the link won't show them other photos from that subject, plus to help the person closing the nom since they sometimes go and add the section during that process. Perhaps a good middle ground would be to leave the section out of the link and just mention it after like "(section 'Friuli-Venezia Giulia' doesn’t exist yet)". Cart (talk) 12:51, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Cart, I cannot prove that the bot really misbehaves in this way – I think I have noticed this two or three times in the past, but all cases happened last year or so and I have forgotten to note down the cases. However, FPCBot has many idiosyncrasies (to put it mildly) and hence I think it’s better to err on the save side (because if the bot really puts an image into the wrong subsection, this kind of error will often go unnoticed). Therefore I think your middle ground is the best possible solution: It avoids the risk of bot errors, is clear to the voters and helpful for the one who closes the nomination and/or for us who have to create the new subsection and to move the photo to it. So in the future I will obey to this strategy (and please remember me if I ever forget it in the hurry of the daily routine!). Thank you and all the best, – Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sitno nov 2023.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sitno nov 2023.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Beilstein - Billensbach - Stocksberger Str. 14 - Werkstatt - Fenster mit Hopfenranken (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beilstein - Billensbach - Stocksberger Str. 14 - Werkstatt - Fenster mit Hopfenranken (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-47

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwaigern - Massenbach - Baumgruppe am Wilhelmstaler Bach bei Sonnenuntergang (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-48

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:38, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wiewiórka w Parku Bednarskiego w Krakowie, 20241117 0903 2741.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haigerloch - Altstadt - Schloss - Ansicht von SSW (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:11, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markgröningen - Altstadt - Schlossgasse 8 - Detail Fenster (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Beilstein - Wohngebiet Ost - Lembergerstr. 13 - Holzzaun - Augen (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beilstein - Wohngebiet Ost - Lembergerstr. 13 - Holzzaun - Augen (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Nikiszowiec, courtyard with chimneys, 2024-08-09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nikiszowiec, courtyard with chimneys, 2024-08-09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:19, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tübingen - Altstadt - Neckarfront - Hölderlinturm, Alte Aula, Anlegestelle, Stiftskirche von Neckarinsel (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oberstenfeld - Petersberg - Peterskirche - Ansicht von Osten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:40, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenloher Freilandmuseum - Baugruppe Hohenloher Dorf - Haus Frank aus Elzhausen - Ansicht von OSO (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 07:38, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart - West - Johanneskirche - Ansicht von SSW im Mai (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neckarsulm - Dahenfeld - Dorfkern - Rathaus - Ansicht von SW (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Artemev Nikolay 10:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohenloher Freilandmuseum - Baugruppe Waldberge - Forsthaus - Küche - Essecke (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beilstein - Wohngebiet Ost - Lembergerstr. 13 - Holzzaun - Augen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 10:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kürnbach - Ortskern - Lammstr. 5 (Lamm) - Wirtshausschild - Ansicht von SSO (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Waldenbuch - Innenstadt - Stadtfriedhof - Parkplatz - Pflaster (1).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waldenbuch - Innenstadt - Stadtfriedhof - Parkplatz - Pflaster (1).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heilbronn - Innenstadt - Industriegebiet Neckar - Kaiser’s-Turm - Ansicht von Osten (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 09:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lauffen a.N. - Landturm - Ansicht von WSW (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:12, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]